Hope for the 50 f1.4 as it's my most used lens, so I would happily ditch the adapter I'm using with the EF version of the Sigma, so the ensemble is shorter and more balanced. Also Sigma has great compact primes under i series definitely worth being ported to RF. For Astro photographers their most recent release 14mm is something that would be a great addition to RF mount. Those must be exactly the two first lenses to come, given that neither niche is even rumored by Canon.that RF 100mm Macro is stupidly overpriced(~$1650 in India) with useless SA control and focus shift features, Sigma's 105mm Macro is quite reasonably priced and a decent lens to start. 50/1.4 must be the most demanded and most obvious "missing" lens, and as soon as we had small-sensor but otherwise pro-type cameras, the question of a purpose-made small-sensor zoom has come up. In contrast the two lenses suggested would indeed plug some huge holes in the lineup. Why is that? We have like 4-5 macro lenses already, 1.4:1 and 1:2. We hope that we're going to hear more definitive information in the coming month or two. This information comes from an unknown source, so please treat it accordingly. We would not expect much, if any crossover of focal ranges and speed for a long while from Sigma for the RF mount. I think a “fast” RF-S mount zoom would be the most likely out of the gate. Canon has also shown us over the decades, they have no interest in making a new 50mm f/1.4. I don't think we'd see fast wide angle primes from SIGMA before Canon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |